Diagnostic value of clinical manifestations of Group A and Group B compared with rubella serology results in congenital rubella syndrome

Open

Sulasmi Sulasmi, Teuku Muhammad Thaib, Anidar Anidar, Dora Darussalam, Rusdi Andid, Herlina Dimiati

2024 Paediatrica Indonesiana(Paediatrica Indonesiana) Vol. 64 Issue 2 Article Cited by 0 SDG 3 Quartile

Abstract

Background Congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) is the triad of defects/abnormalities in the heart, eyes, and ears, resulting from rubella virus infection, especially in the first trimester of pregnancy. Manifestations of CRS are divided into Group A including: hearing loss, congenital heart disease, cataracts or glaucoma, and pigmentary; Group B consisted of purpura, splenomegaly, microcephaly, mental retardation, retinopathy and icteric, radiolucent bone disoreder, that appears within 24 hours after birth. CRS diagnosis is based on serologic rubella test results. Comprehensive management of CRS is needed to achieve optimal child development. However, not all referral center hospitals in Indonesia have serological rubella examination modalities. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of group A and group B clinical manifestations compared to rubella serology results in the diagnosis of CRS. Methods This cross-sectional study used secondary data from medical records of pediatric patients with suspected CRS who meet the criteria for groups A and B aged less than 12 months who had been hospitalized at Dr. Zainoel Abidin Regional General Hospital, Banda Aceh, during the three-year study period (2019-2021) which had complete data were included in the study. The IgM serology results were used as diagnostic comparison that performed at the age of less than 12 months. Results A total of 126 patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-five (51.6%) subjects were male, 80 (63.5%) subjects had normal birth weight, and 89 (70.6%) subjects were aged <6 months. The diagnostic sensitivity for groups A, B, as well as A and B clinical manifestations were 100%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. This excellent sensitivity value suggested that the clinical manifestations of groups A and B would be suitable as screening tools because they could “catch” many patients with suspected CRS. Conclusion The clinical manifestations of group A and group B have excellent diagnostic value as a screening tool for CRS. © 2024, Indonesian Pediatric Society Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Affiliations

Department of Child Health, Universitas Syiah Kuala Medical Faculty, Dr. Zainoel Abidin General Hospital, Aceh, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Research at a Glance

Premium content — register to unlock

Research at a Glance

Register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Premium content — register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Register to unlock

Collaboration

Premium content — register to unlock

Collaboration

Register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Premium content — register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Register to unlock

References Overview

Premium content — register to unlock

References Overview

Register to unlock

Journal & Source

Premium content — register to unlock

Journal & Source

Register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Premium content — register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Register to unlock